Quote:
Ordoman previously said:
You have valid points...I don't really know how the politics work, but in general, organized campaigns work better than angry individuals. It's good to get as much information as you can from wherever you can get it.
|
I'd like to see just one organized orv campaign get started which didn't require that its participants forgo working together in the first place.
These damn "shared trails" organizers expect the average orver to have some kind of "pay-no-attention-to-the-man-behind-the-curtain" attitude with both our money and our time..yet when the time comes for arrogant arses in their fellow national non-profits to shut the rest of us out of the land that we own for no damn good reason...we're all supposed to just sit here with our mouths shut and send more money in to further water down the concept of true multi-use trails and more importantly cross-sport cooperation.
By the way, guess what recently happened when I demanded that the state quit tying the public's right to formally ask questions of them in our regular meetings with another group's 'special' agenda that now obviously won't? (simply demanding that the '07 meeting schedule be published after over a month of screwing around):
http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dn...E_180055_7.pdf
We can't keep allowing these people to set these kind of procedural precedents over the
simplest of access matters involving either the government or even our own leaders.
These matters are
not akin to saving the free world as we know it....and we
have to start looking at just who is
benefitting from these cowardly actions when each door is slammed in our face over simply demanding that no one group ever take precedence over another.
