Quote:
tnegiet previously said:
EDIT...
Two people and a whiner that doesn't deserve to own an FJ does not constitute a mob...but the mentality fits!
|
For the record, Tnegiet has publicly stated that he has no damage to his paint or his windshield, yet he has made it his personal quest to publicly reject others who are seeking for Toyota to make these two weak links in the FJs armor right.
You're such a tool! I suggest that you get on the FJ approval board so that you can apply the "Tnegiet cool guy test" to approve or reject future owners. Perhaps you can seek that as your next bot promotion!
I don't know what your deal is or why you have such a stick up your okole about people who are trying to make things right to benefit ALL owners. I love how you can count but it only goes to show that your observation is merely a reflection of self! I think that on the contrary, your camp does fit your estimated numbers. On the other hand, the camp supporting legal action with regard to the windshields is growing daily.
Like it or not, you are the nearly silent minority! And certainly the only one left standing to be so vociferous as to summarily reject actions that may positively affect FJ owners. If you had it your way, owners would continue to replace windshields out of pocket for the remainder of their ownership. Because, clearly, the beamoth named Toyota could NEVER put out a bad product...
I can't help it if you are a...Dee, Dee, DEE!
P.S. didn't mean to jack this post...I don't know why some people choose to beat a dead horse after truces were drawn...but suspect It's cause they're a .....Dee, dee, DEE!
