Interested in the new Toyota Tundra? Stop in at the Toyota Tundra Forum @ www.tundratalk.net!
Toyota FJ Cruiser Header Background Toyota FJ Cruiser Header Right

» Search Used Cars
Search for used vehicles by ZIP, please enter Zipcode below:
Google Links


» Wheel & Tire Center

Google Ads

Sponsors

Go Back   Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum > Home
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Chat Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Registered Members do not see the above ads. Please Register Today - It's quick and free!
Thread: Gear Help!!!!!
View Single Post
Old 05-12-2008, 01:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
SKINUM
Forum Veteran
 
SKINUM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Member Number: 18535
Location: SWVA----LB
Posts: 799
Re: Gear Help!!!!!

Quote:
SKINUM previously said: View Post
So, does the size of the tire alone warrant regearing? A 33 inch tire comes in different weights. So, for instance if you go with a 33x10.50 in comparison to a 33x12.50 the 10.50 is going to be less weight. Does the overall height change the revolutions of the tire which would cause a gearing issue or does the weight cause this issue? I guess it could be combined.

To me it seems that if your overall weight increases by 3-4lbs per tire over stock then regearing isn't really needed.

For instance a 255/85/16 tire: weight 53lbs Rim width 7in rpm's 625 33.3
265/75/16 tire: weight 51lbs Rim width 7.5 rpm's 652 31.9

Net difference 1.4 and 8lb increase

Seems to me your decreasing your rpm's by the increase in tire height then a increase in weight. So, the rpm's run lower with only a increase in weight of 8lbs. To me this combination would seem to give the advantage of clearance and no real reduction in torque or gas mileage.

However, if you go with a 35 then your total weight of each tire is 64lbs. So, your total weight increase is 52lbs. and rpm's drop to 598. 31.9 stock and 34.8 =2.9 difference. In this case it seems that rpm's decrease more because of the additional weight rather then height.

With my reasoning it seems that with the 33 inch option there would be no real disadvantage. Actually, with the added height, less rpm's and a increase of only 8lbs to me it would seem more advantageous.

So what am I missing?
Anyone?
SKINUM is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 AM.

  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.