Interested in the new Toyota Tundra? Stop in at the Toyota Tundra Forum @ www.tundratalk.net!
Toyota FJ Cruiser Header Background Toyota FJ Cruiser Header Right

Google Links


» Wheel & Tire Center

Google Ads

Sponsors

Go Back   Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum > Trail > Land Use Action Forum
Register Home Forum Active Topics Photo Gallery Chat Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Land Use Action Forum A place for information on land closures and what you can do about them.


       
Registered Members do not see the above ads. Please Register Today - It's quick and free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2007, 11:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Member Number: 10328
Location: NC
Posts: 541
Lifetime Supporting Member
Cape Hatteras National Seashore may banish OHV

sparked by unmarked and undesignated trails and numerous reckless driving violations, OHV access may be banished from this North Carolina beach. a federal judge used a case of a Virginia man who was driving recklessly over Memorial Day weekend to support his ruling.

READ STORY HERE
__________________
2007 TRD SE
+ 2.5" SAW Coilovers
+ Camburg UCAs
+ Toytec Custom rear springs
+ Donahoe Racing rear shocks
FloJo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-19-2007, 11:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
Matt-erator
 
Matt07FJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Member Number: 1413
Location: Lebanon, VA
Posts: 2,993
Send a message via AIM to Matt07FJ
Lifetime Supporting Member
Re: Cape Hatteras National Seashore may banish OHV

Ouch....hopefully they get the squared away pretty quickly....that's a huge portion of what makes the OBX so amazing...
__________________
'99 4Runner - SR5 Sport
*************************
07 FJC - Sun Fusion - Sold
My Buildup
*************************


TLCA Member #16924
Matt07FJ is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2007, 12:11 PM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Master
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Member Number: 932
Location: st augustine fl
Posts: 1,099
Lifetime Supporting Member
Re: Cape Hatteras National Seashore may banish OHV

The same thing just happened here in St Augustine. The County finished the plan just in time to save beach driving. We are only allowed to drive on the beach between 8AM and 8PM. The police usually start making you leave the beach at 6:30PM so they can get everyone out and lock the gates at the beach ramps. This has been threated to happen at OBX for the last 5 or 10 years (along with the new state salt water fishing license). Hopefully the Park Service will get their plan written down and submitted in time to save beach driving. We lost the use of Anastasia State Park for beach driving and it was one of the best fishing spots here.
fjal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2007, 07:21 AM   #4 (permalink)
Forum Master
 
Brian - VABeach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Member Number: 1584
Location: Virgin Beach, VA
Posts: 1,076
Re: Cape Hatteras National Seashore may banish OHV

This proposal is open for public comments until 7-30-07. Here is a National Park Services link where you can enter your comments and make your voice heard if you want to keep Hatteras beaches open for us to drive on:


NPS PEPC - 07/02/2007 - Federal Register Notice Published for Cape Hatteras - Submit Comments
Brian - VABeach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2007, 08:15 AM   #5 (permalink)
Land Use Mod
 
k9crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Member Number: 3833
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 638
Lifetime Supporting Member
Re: Cape Hatteras National Seashore may banish OHV

More info on closing OBX to vehicles. I wanted to make sure EVERYONE has seen this. The law firm (SELC) is the same one that is suing the FS to close Tellico!

http://www.southernenvironment.org/cases/hatteras/index.htm

http://www.islandfreepress.org/Archives/2007.11.05-ShootingTheBreezePlanningFutureOfBeachDriving.html

Environmental groups sue Park Service over beach driving
By IRENE NOLAN

The Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), representing The Defenders of Wildlife and the National Audubon Society, is taking the National Park Service to court for its failure to adopt regulations to manage beach driving at the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

The environmental groups filed a lawsuit on Thursday, Sept. 18, in federal court in the Eastern District of North Carolina. The suit claims that the interim protected species management plan under which the Park Service has been operating does not do enough to protect species of shorebirds and sea turtles that nest on the seashore.

“The Park Service has failed to develop a beach driving management plan for years despite the legal requirement to do so,” SELC said in a media release. “In addition to federal regulation requiring such protection, in 1973, President Nixon ordered the U.S. Park Service to regulate beach driving to protect natural resources. Most recently, U.S. District Court Judge Terrence Boyle issued an order concluding driving on the Seashore illegal as the Park Service has failed to adopt beach driving regulations.”

The groups also filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue over violations of the Endangered Species Act in connection with the interim management plan.
The lawsuit contends that the interim plan, which is intended to protect the birds and turtles until a long-range plan is adopted, does not go far enough.
“We’ve been attempting to engage the National Park Service in a dialogue about endangered and threatened species,” said Jason Rylander, staff attorney for Defenders of Wildlife. But, he noted, the interim plan falls “far short.”

Specifically, said Walker Golder, a biologist for Audubon North Carolina, the buffer distances between nesting areas and ORV access routes are inadequate, the timing of posting for nesting in the spring is inadequate, and the response to problems during the nesting season is also inadequate.
“No one wants deny the rights of fishermen and families to enjoy beaches along the National Seashore, but our beaches are turning into highways. In the meantime, the Park Service has stood idly by, shirking its responsibility to institute simple rules and instead watching natural resources be destroyed and a once-responsible tradition spin out of control,” said SELC attorney Derb Carter.

The groups noted that populations of protected and threatened shorebirds are in a steep decline on the seashore and that 2007 nesting results have been dismal.

“We are not seeking to prohibit driving on the beach but to regulate it according to law,” said Derb Carter, director of the SELC’s Carolinas office.
He said the groups involved in the lawsuit will not seek an injunction or any preliminary relief “at this time.”

“Whether we do,” he said, “depends on the National Park Service response.”
“We know that beach driving and managing species can be compatible,” said Chris Canfield, director of Audubon North Carolina, noting that members of the group and staff members drive on seashore beaches.

Cape Hatteras National Seashore Supt. Mike Murray did not have an immediate response to the lawsuit. A spokesman said the Park Service and its attorneys had not seen the filing and wouldn’t respond until they did.
Meanwhile, the Park Service intends to continue with informal meetings of its proposed negotiated rulemaking committee, scheduled for Monday and Tuesday in Nags Head.

The Park Service hopes to devise a long-range ORV management plan by the negotiated rulemaking process. Setting up a committee of stakeholders to sit at the table and devise beach driving regulations has been underway for at least three years. The proposed committee members from various stakeholder groups have still not been finally approved by the Secretary of the Department of Interior.

The SELC, Defenders of Wildlife, and North Carolina Audubon are all proposed members of the negotiated rulemaking committee. They said yesterday that they would not withdraw from the process.

“That’s a decision for the National Park Service to make,” Carter said.
More information and the legal documents are available at
http://www.southernenvironment.org/cases/hatteras/index.htm
__________________
Heather
Titanium '07 FJ Cruiser - #1774!
Red and White 1973 FJ55
TreadLightly! Master Trainer


k9crazy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


  Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum > Trail > Land Use Action Forum




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.0

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.

  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.


LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0