This is funny, go away dodge! the hummers bad enough. (Cars.com Comparison)

**FJ FunJunkie** · 04-05-2007, 10:30 PM

check out this compairison
cars.com: New SUVs | Faceoff: Macho SUV
I guess we need to all grow weird 80's style moustaches.

Tingtong · 04-05-2007, 10:46 PM

Cars.com sucks!

***Dragon*** · 04-05-2007, 10:48 PM

The H3 carries on the legacy of the H1? Huh!

That may be the worst comparison I have ever seen.

Tingtong · 04-05-2007, 10:51 PM

I don't know how they came up with the hummer being better offroad than the FJ....anyone ever actually seen an H3 off the pavement?

**FJ FunJunkie** · 04-05-2007, 11:36 PM

yeah, I saw one break on the beginning of the tral last weekend, after i got to the top, and he was lifted.lol

blackseabk · 04-06-2007, 12:47 AM

Higgins get the lads off of me.

**FJ FunJunkie** · 04-06-2007, 01:21 AM

Quote:

blackseabk previously said:

Higgins get the lads off of me.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thugasaur · 04-06-2007, 04:26 AM

Its Funny Im Watching Magnum Pi While Reading This Oh Bitter Irony!

AF Chief · 04-06-2007, 05:07 AM

Including the Nitro skews the results. Just like including the Sorento skewed Peterson's test. Also, saying PT 4WD makes the AT less capable off-road (whats the difference once its engaged) and glossing over the H3's water fording shortfall is BS.

Take the Nitro out, shouldn't be there anyway:

Price: FJ
Drivetrain: FJ
Ride: FJ (IMHO)
Parking: Push
Comfort: H3 (for another $8K)
Entry Exit: Push, but edge to 4-door H3
Safety: Not sure
Cargo: Push
Off-road: debatable, Push
Value: lets include resale, FJ
Reliability: they skipped this one, and its huge (search H3 head and valve)

RonDeF · 04-06-2007, 05:15 AM

It's obivious that the reviewer from cars.com has his head up his a$$.