[quote=jeshua;280878]
Just watched the video and I though it was great and made some very good arguments.
"....My questions to Kzoocruiser is y pay if there is nothing to maintain. These are offroad trails and don't / shouldn't be graded we don't need a outhouse just a bush like all the other creators in the forsets or deserts. I just don't see what needs to be maintained and if there is nothing that needs to be maintained then there is no need to pay....."
Every national orv organization out there (and many local ones also) have lived by this false premise for years...mainly to make sure that the
2nd much less bankable dollar out of your wallet (supporting sustainable eco-friendly local maintenance/enforcement programs) doesn't interfere with the 1st dollar we send nationally to support these "ask no true multi-use questions of us" non-profits.
I defy you to find national orv leader
one willing to defend your above premise out of one side of their mouth....while claiming that we are all just "good stewards of the environment" out of the other.
We impact the ground we tread on....period.
We need to PAY to sustainably maintain said ground over time and build the same bridges that this guy claims there in not one dollar being spent in Alberta to build...OUT OF OUR MONEY.
I 100% understand the liberal thought process prevalent both in our country and theirs. It has poisoned our youth into believing that a sticker with the BRC; Tread Lightly or NOHVCC emblem on it.....is all that is needed to become good stewards of the limited amount of resources availiable to us every year to tackle our multi-use problems. These (quote/unquote) 'leaders' are NOT stopping these cycle organizations from splitting us in half with their arrogant me-only land grabs and they are NOT standing up to these same people in regards to ferreting our issues away behind closed doors. (or at public meetings where simple requests for "Q and A" periods are rudely ignored).
"....We just need to remember to be good stewarts of what God has given us by packing in packing out....."
Good point and one which should be repeated again and again....yet not something that gets beyond the more urgent issue of actually
paying to be there in the first place and paying to pick up behind every single person who doesn't subscribe to that notion!

Does anybody believe that with this last generation being effectively shut
out of learning about responsible orv issues at even the highest organization levels in our own community (through narcisistic scattered groups with no multi-use focus and
majority uninterested fathers/mothers on the ground) that these 'kids' will somehow act in a manner requiring more money out of each and every one of us in the future....or less?
"....We also do pay right now in taxes witch some of it goes to forest services to patrol forest land so we even have some police out on the trail right now that is payed for....."
Again, show me one future sustainable non-orv funded budget that will make a
dent in the issue above or any other
orv issue out there going forward. WE MUST
PAY OUR OWN WAY, FOLKS and expecting "taxes" to fund anything but even the administration of these programs (still not the ideal) is just another avenue for resentment that the non-riding public
will travel.
"...But we should also do are part on the policing and when you see some one making an ass of them self or trashing the place tell them to stop or we will loose what we have. I just don't see what needs to be maintained it is dirt road for crying out loud it is not suppose to be easy......"
Policing our own is great...it's just not being done in any kind of numbers whatsoever and you can confirm this by counting the number of clubs who brag about partnering with law enforcement or sponsoring impoundment laws/even larger fines as a condition of 'hanging with them' in the first place.
The present proper maintenance of many of our trails is the next biggest front that these greenies will make and this guess is no more glaringly evident than here in Michigan where the state can't even find the resources to properly evaluate the damn things in the first place!.
Cyclists and greenie state employees keep the heavily worn trails down to 50"....while the state calls out for both money-saving and do-the-job-right privitized maintenance bids
that they know will never come! (how do you expect the private sector to become involved using 21st century equipment; when they're saddled with 50" trails that these cyclists and their national orv organization "buddies" support over the
legally allowed 60" at every turn?).
If there are more enthusiasts out there
every day speaking frankly about these ridiculously simple "stand up like a man" problems....great.
I just haven't witnessd it to date.
