Rear HD Lower Control Arms Available @ Man-A-Fre for $199 - Page 4 - Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum
4x4 / Off-Road Tech This section contains all discussion related to taking the FJ Cruiser in Off-Road situations, 4x4 applications and any armor modifications.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #31 of 31 (permalink) Old 09-12-2006, 09:56 AM
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 619
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Re: Rear HD Lower Control Arms Available @ Man-A-Fre for $199

MoabRat previously said:
Boy I sure agree with that. Once you get a TJ up over 4 inches it is really not very streetable. From 2 or 3 inches up you definitly get shake without adjusting control arms and/or doing a slip yoke conversion on the tcase. I am sure interested in the "built to lift it" stuff you said. I think the Pinion is ok with 3 inches or lower on the FJ. What I'm curious about is what you said about the CV angles. Could you explain more what you mean? I've heard so many different and mostly uneducated opinions on the CV joints. I would think the optimum angle would be unflexed and at factory height. Why did Toyota design them for a height that the vehicle is not "supposed" to be at?
The Rubicon doesn't need the SYE like other Jeeps due to the larger T case and spacer that it is designed with. It does however need a new drive shaft ( I did a T\W ) and Adjustable CA's to get the driveline back into shape.
If you go over 5.5" you really should work on a LA kit vs the Short Arms to make it streetable.
Mine is a 4.5"+ and might not get bigger ( any taller and it won't fit in my garage ) but it might also. I intend to 3 link the rear at some point and try to have it to be buildable as I go.
As for the CV angles- the FJ actually has the axles i a negative angle before putting a 3" lift on it that puts them very near horizontal- as moth other IFS vehicles are.
I am not sure if this was intentional but it really seems like they were ready to have the vehicle lifted ( maybe bean counters stopped 33's on it like they have done with the Jeeps).
THe Jeeps spedo is right on if you go from the 31's and swap to 33's like I did.
I understand that the Rubicon was originally designed to take 33's ( and could with the sway attached) - maybe the FJ was also the same? I don't know the answer to this.

3" OME lift- the axle is actually straighter than the pics depicts- it is at a bad angle.
Damageinc is offline  
Sponsored Links

  Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum > Toyota FJ Cruiser Discussion > 4x4 / Off-Road Tech

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Toyota FJ Cruiser Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

  Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rear Bumper lower middle painted panel REMOVAL ??? Help please FjTonkaBoy Interior / Exterior Visual Tech 8 01-23-2009 12:22 PM
Upper Control arms Aymaestro 4x4 / Off-Road Tech 32 09-10-2007 08:48 PM
FJC Rubicon Express Super Flex Joint Lower Control Link Install CO-Jeff 4x4 / Off-Road Tech 62 12-21-2006 06:43 AM
Made rear lower Control Arms Skids treknwil 4x4 / Off-Road Tech 15 08-13-2006 10:14 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome